Why I HAD to install Linux

Tux
Recently I've decided to pick up a new programming language. My reasons are mostly not wanting to be hacking away at legacy code for another 5 years. I've already started to realize that in my young programming career I'm already getting behind the curve in the programming world.

In any case I decided to work with a few colleagues on a side project, not that we have a project per se, just a few general ideas and a desire to make things. Part of our goal with this project is to learn various aspects of newer technologies, Pearl, Python, GIT, Tornado, etc.

At first I was under the impression that learning these various language/technologies would not require me to change my default OS Windows (currently split between windows 7 on my desktop and windows XP on my laptop). However, even being comfortable with the command line on windows I was finding that as I read various sites discussing approach and technique for these newer tools I was feeling like a second class citizen.

When I've been searching around the inter-webs looking for various pieces of information on technologies associated with Windows I would come across mentions of "If you're looking for Linux support please see..." and there would be a paragraph or two, perhaps a page, but not really a lot of in-depth information. Meanwhile I was weeding through pages and pages of information on the WIN32 side of things.

Now as I begin learning about these amazing new tools, I'm faced with being the class of user who really isn't the primary audience. The amount of information out there for users working on a windows OS and working with Linux tools is small, very small.

At first I was thinking "what is with this community, why are they snubbing such a large group of users who could expand there market share so much?" Then I decided "No, I want to learn this stuff so I'm just going to stick with it." What I realized was Windows is NOT primarily a programming OS but Linux feels like it was "made for programmers by programmers".

Yes, you can program on a windows box and yes there are even some awesome tools (even free ones) from MS, for example Visual Web Developer 2010 (http://www.microsoft.com/express/downloads/) which provides a very nice feature of intellisense/autocomplete for JavaScript, including functions you write yourself but, it's still an OS for the masses. As I begin my dive into the Linux world I'm seeing that even with the most "user friendly" flavor (Ubuntu, which is what I'm currently experimenting/learning with) it is really "nice" for programming on.

Right from the beginning I can see how many of the tools I need are at my fingertips ready to go out of the box. Python - installed and ready to go. SSH- installed and ready to go. VIM - installed and ready to go. Even the terminal seems to lend itself to hacking. I'm not usually one to be a fan-boy right out of the gate, but I think I might be turning into one.

It's refreshing to be expanding my horizons and finding a new reason to get excited about my computer.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Using telnet to troubleshoot connectivity.... and watch Star Wars

Image
So the teaser I'll lead off with is, at the end of this post you'll know how to watch Star Wars A New Hope in ASCII art form (i.e. text based graphics)... So let's begin. Recently I found myself working on a legacy application such that I had to redeploy the multi-node application into in Infrastructure running in Azure. Two of the models communicate via a WCF binding over net.tcp. While I was operating under the impression that the firewall had been opened up to allow the communication I was a bit stuck on how to validate that the communication was working. So I wandered up to the networking area to chat with our Network Architect. As I often find, chatting with those who have an expertise different than your own requires patience and effort in the area of translation. Even though we both work in the IT field we each have our jargon to deal with, but the price of admission is well worth it. In just a few minutes of explaining my challenge I had been provided wi
Read more

.NET MSTest and DeploymentItem Attribute

Image
I was recently reminded that order of operation can byte you when trying to troubleshoot intermittent unit test failures. First, I’ll be the first to admit that if you want to avoid problems with unit testing it’s best to avoid any dependency outside of your actual code base, things like databases, API and even the file system are best avoided in execution of your unit tests. That last one, the file system, in some applications is really hard to avoid. If you happen to be using MSTest, a helpful attribute for your test is DeploymentItem. This particular attribute allows you to define a file within your unit test project assuming it’s marked as “Copy Always”. With this attribute in place you can then combine this with TestContext.DeploymentDirectory to find this sample file and then do what you need to do. In my particular case I was having an issue with the unit tests failing on the build machine but not locally. After stumbling around for a bit I finally feel back to t
Read more

Example of using LazyInitializer.EnsureInitialized

Image
When looking at making systems more efficient it's helpful to think about being lazy. A helpful tool in the .NET tool belt is the static class under the System.Threading namespace LazyInitializer. In particular this class contains a method  EnsureInitialized This method is very simple to use and provides a convenient way to ensure that an initialization is called only once based on the value of the target property already being populated. For example, if you need to load a file as part of the setting of values in an application you can use the EnsureInitialized method. The following is a derived example of using the class to illustrate the usage pattern. If you are having trouble viewing the below code you can use this link to view the gist github. https://gist.github.com/briannipper/ac2778ccd0d15b4ab217083331419ae7 using System; using System.Collections.Generic; namespace Example.EnsureInitialized { class Program { static void Main(string[] args)
Read more